Back to all articles
Read in
Real Estate & Construction13 SEPT 2026·Arpad PetriLinkedIn· 4 min read

We Help International Investors and Project Owners Deliver Major CEE Projects Without Expensive Surprises

Independent project intelligence and advisory across energy, transport, real estate and industrial construction.

Poland Pulled EUR 3.06bn Into Property in Half a Year. Its Builders Are Short 150,000 People and Losing 42 Per Cent of Their Engineers

Polish commercial property investment rose 72 per cent to EUR 3.06bn in the first half of 2026, while new industrial supply fell 16.2 per cent year on year. Randstad puts the sector 150,000 workers short with engineer turnover at 42 per cent, which turns a funding story into a delivery and claims problem.

Poland Pulled EUR 3.06bn Into Property in Half a Year. Its Builders Are Short 150,000 People and Losing 42 Per Cent of Their Engineers

I keep seeing the same failure on well funded building programmes. The money lands on time and the people who priced the job leave. Poland is the clearest example of it in Europe right now.

Randstad's construction labour report, carried by EurobuildCEE on 1 September 2026, puts Poland short of 150,000 workers. Turnover among engineers has reached 42 per cent. That second number is the one a project board should read twice.

The capital is arriving on schedule

Poland's commercial property market absorbed EUR 3.06bn of investment in the first half of 2026. That is 72 per cent up on a year earlier. It is also more than half of all Central and Eastern European volume. The figures come from Colliers' Market Insights H1 2026 report, published on 10 September 2026.

Public money is moving at the same speed. More than PLN 14bn of contracts have been awarded on the Port Polska hub. A further PLN 40bn is due before the end of the year. Budimex took the passenger terminal foundation package at PLN 145.95m gross, covering over 8,000 piles and ground improvement columns.

Supply is going the other way

Poland's modern industrial and logistics stock passed 38 million sqm at the end of June. About 0.6 million sqm completed in the second quarter, 11.4 per cent below the first. New supply across four quarters came to roughly 1.8 million sqm, down 16.2 per cent year on year. Those are BNP Paribas Real Estate Poland figures published on 11 September 2026.

Occupiers are taking up what already exists. Vacancy fell to 6.6 per cent at the end of June, a three year low. Gross take up rose 21 per cent to 3.51 million sqm in the first half. CBRE published those numbers the same day. Demand rising against falling completions is the signature of a market that cannot build fast enough.

Turnover in the professional grades is a contract risk

A missing bricklayer is a productivity problem. You can price it, subcontract it or bring it in from abroad. A missing commercial manager behaves differently.

At 42 per cent annual turnover, average tenure in the engineering grades runs under two and a half years. Most large Polish building contracts run longer. On a four year design and build job, the team that priced the tender will largely have gone by handover.

Under FIDIC that has a specific price. Claims turn on notices served in time and on contemporary records. They also turn on what the parties agreed at tender about scope and risk. Much of that sits in the heads of a few people. When they leave, the paperwork stays behind and the reasoning behind it walks out.

The cost surfaces late. It appears as a variation nobody can trace and a notice served after the bar date. It appears again as a delay claim that fails on evidence. None of it is in the tender price.

There is no spare pool next door

The standard answer is to recruit from western Europe. That door is closing. The S&P Global Eurozone Construction PMI fell to 43.0 in August from 44.3 in July. That is a 52nd consecutive month of contraction. Data was collected between 12 and 28 August 2026.

Employment across eurozone construction fell for a seventh straight month, with job losses at a four month high. France and Germany cut hardest. Housing was the weakest of the three sub sectors, followed by commercial work.

A shrinking industry sheds people permanently. Experienced staff who leave during a downturn seldom return. The pool Poland would draw on is draining at the moment Poland needs it most.

What sponsors should do about it

Programme risk in Poland now sits in the staffing plan as much as in the ground conditions. Sponsors should ask for named people and contractual continuity. Lenders should test whether the delivery team survives the drawdown period.

Contractors bidding four year jobs into a 42 per cent turnover market are pricing a team they may not keep. The next two years will separate firms that hold their commercial staff from those that do not. Capital is no longer the binding constraint on Polish delivery.


📊 Analytics & Strategic Insight

The limit on delivery moved from money to people, and tender prices have not caught up

The decision most in this industry are avoiding:

👉 Staff turnover belongs on the risk register. Most boards watch material prices and interest rates. Almost none watch whether the site team stays.

👉 Losing your managers hurts more than losing your trades. A crew can be hired in a month. A manager who knows the bid history cannot.

👉 The lowest price now carries the highest delivery risk. A thin bid assumes the same team stays, which a market losing 42 per cent a year rarely allows.

Here's the full context:

→ 2022: Eurozone building work begins a decline that has now run 52 months in a row.

→ June 2026: Polish warehouse vacancy falls to 6.6 per cent, a three year low, on CBRE data.

→ August 2026: Port Polska reports over PLN 14bn of contracts awarded, with PLN 40bn more due this year.

→ September 2026: The eurozone construction PMI reads 43.0 and jobs fall for a seventh month.

→ Most recent: Poland is short 150,000 construction workers and engineer turnover has reached 42 per cent.

What this means for infrastructure operators, contractors and investors:

✅ Programme risk is now a staffing question. Ground and permits show up on every report. The site team is the risk nobody prices.

✅ Claims outcomes will split sharply. Builders who keep their commercial staff get money back that weaker rivals write off.

✅ Capacity sets the ceiling on Polish delivery. More money in the same market lifts prices long before it lifts output.

3 moves you can make this week:

1️⃣ Name the delivery team in the contract. Ask for named staff clauses, the right to approve any swap, and real notice periods.

2️⃣ Audit your own tender knowledge. Write down what was excluded, assumed and agreed at bid, then store it outside one inbox.

3️⃣ Reprice continuity into the bid. Add a cost line for keeping and handing over staff. Then rank bidders on team stability too.

Share it with your peers

Help your network stay ahead of CEE capital projects.

Free · CEE visualsCEE Infographs Library

Explore our infograph library — strategic visuals for CEE capital projects leaders.

Project benchmarks, financing structures, tender dynamics and delivery risk — at a glance. Free access for investors, owners, contractors and strategy teams tracking CEE capital projects.

Browse the library

Related analyses

Facing a decision on a CEE capital project?

Describe the situation in a few sentences. Within 72 hours you get an experienced read: the risks we see, what we'd check, and whether we can help — no calls, no obligation.